01/09/2006
Welcome to the first Mailbag of 2006. I hope that you all had a terrific holiday season, whatever holidays you chose to celebrate, and that 2006 is treating you kindly. Winter Warm-Up is coming soon, and it's less than six weeks until pitchers and catchers report.
As always, if you have a question, use the link below to submit it -- and please be sure to include your first name, last initial and hometown. If you send a regular e-mail, rather than using the form, be certain to use the word "mailbag" in the subject header -- otherwise your mail may be directed to the spam folder, or otherwise ignored in an unbecoming manner.
Can you see any downside to the Cardinals signing Sidney Ponson? I see it as very low risk (what's a million dollars in baseball money?) with a lot of potential. The guy did pitch over 200 innings in 2003. I think it could be the steal of the offseason for [general manager Walt]Jocketty. -- Kirk W., Peru, Ill.
The Cardinals just signed Ponson, and I heard that he has had some trouble with the law. If he makes the team this spring, how will he fit in with the rest of the Cardinals? -- Matt L., St. Charles, Mo.
These were just two of lots of questions I received about the Ponson signing.
Personally, I like the move a lot. As Kirk points out, it's very low risk, and if somehow the Cardinals can rediscover the 2003 Ponson, that's a very nice addition. He's a ground-ball guy, which the organization loves, and he's been rather durable for the most part. I also believe that he won't beat out Anthony Reyes unless he's actually ready to pitch. I don't think a job will simply be handed to him.
As for fitting in, I think one of the admirable things about the Cardinals clubhouse is how the players police themselves. My expectation is that if Ponson doesn't toe the line, doesn't do the work expected of the starters, his teammates will get him back on course. As for the off-the-field issues, he will continue to receive treatment for his alcoholism, and I believe and hope that he is sincere in his desire to be successful in that fight.
I am absolutely ecstatic about the Cardinals signing Juan Encarnacion. He had a career year last year and I think he would thrive in our lineup with Albert [Pujols], Jimmy [Edmonds] and Scott [Rolen]. His career numbers aren't that great but I think he's matured and will hit for better averages and on-base percentage. He's also a solid defensive player. Where do you think he would go in our lineup? What do you think about the pickup?
Allow me to use this opportunity to make a shameless plug for my blog at MLBlogs, called "Obviously, You're Not a Golfer." I addressed the Encarnacion signing somewhat there, and frankly I'm not thrilled about it.
If Encarnacion's improvement in on-base ability this past year is real, and not just a career year, then he will be a nice pickup. And as has been noted in some other places, his ability to play a solid right field will help in what should be a spacious new ballpark (see below). But I'm personally not a fan of the kind of hitter he's been for most of his career, and I thought that signing him for three years was pretty risky.
He'll bat in the sixth spot, I would expect, and will have lots of opportunities to drive in runs. I just hope he has a decent OBP to go with those RBIs.
As a long-time Red Sox fan and follower of Brian Daubach, how do you think the Cardinals will use him? -- Don T., Bridgewater, Mass.
I expect Daubach to make the Major League roster, and I expect he will be the primary lefty power threat off the bench and the top backup for Pujols at first base.
Would the Cardinals ever consider trading for Alfonso Soriano? He is a first-rate hitter and would play a solid second base. His bat in the middle of the lineup would produce 30-35 homers, 100 RBIs and give Albert & Scotty a lot of protection. The Cardinals' payroll would get a little heavier, but I think he would be worth it. -- Junior C., Eldon, Mo.
Count me as not a fan of Soriano's. Defense is not his strong suit -- though he does have a strong arm, he's erratic in the field. More importantly, though, take a look at his home/road splits. The last two years, he's been a seriously subpar hitter on the road. His stats have been heavily inflated by playing in Arlington.
That doesn't mean it won't happen, though. I'm not the GM, and the Cards have been known to make moves that I wouldn't have made. But I imagine that Walt Jocketty and Co. can read those splits just as well as I can, and that the Cards' scouts have seen Soriano's shaky defensive play.
This is more a general baseball question than a Cardinals question, but I am sure with your superior wisdom you will be able to help. What does a player's batting ability have to do with their ability to play a particular position? I was reading the update on different Cardinals prospects, and the info on Travis Hanson said he had moved to second from third not only because of Scott Rolen, but because his bat was better suited for up the middle. The article then went on to say that after the move, his numbers went up and perhaps he could handle the "hot corner", at least offensively. Thanks! -- Tim B., Rolla, Mo.
Now, you may all be thinking that I included this question because of the words "superior wisdom," and I admit that I do like compliments. But it's a very interesting question, and I would have answered it anyway. It's really a two-parter, so here goes.
In the case of someone like Hanson, it's not really about a particular type of hitting being suited to a particular position. Rather, it's this: at the more difficult defensive positions (catcher, second base, shortstop, center field), you're willing to put up with less offensive output than at the less difficult positions (first base, left field, right field, and to a lesser extent, third base).
You have to get offensive production from the corners because it's just so hard to find guys who can play up-the-middle defensive positions well while also hitting well. If you do have that, and the Cards have in recent years, it's a huge asset. But when someone says a guy's bat is better suited to second base, or center field, it's another way of saying that he probably won't hit enough to play every day at first or third base, or left or right field.
There is another component to this, and it has to do with where a player is comfortable. Even the "easier" defensive positions are pretty tough, and if a guy is asked to make a position change, then defensive work will take up a great deal of his time. So someone who is struggling to make defensive improvements, and thinking about defense a lot, might understandably find his hitting suffering.
Do you think the Cardinals will attempt to strengthen the backup catching position this year by trade or free agency? This is a position that takes a terrible physical toll and I don't think they should realistically rely on the regular catcher to catch 150 games or so. It seems to me that this is a weak spot when [Yadier] Molina is out. -- Leonard H., Holts Summit, Mo.
Leonard sent this question in back in November, before the signing of Gary Bennett. I do expect Bennett to be the primary backup catcher, and I do expect him to play more often than Einar Diaz did.
Bennett doesn't look like much of an offensive upgrade over Diaz, but offense wasn't the reason Diaz played so rarely. I definitely got the impression that neither the pitchers nor the coaching staff were terribly impressed with Diaz's defense. Bennett, meanwhile, seems to have the respect and approval of the manager and pitching coach, so he'll probably find his way into the lineup more often and give Molina more breathers.
With that said, if it were my decision -- which it obviously isn't -- I would have liked to see the Cards bring in a more offensive-minded backup catcher. But that's not the club's priority, and never has been.
I was very surprised to hear the Cardinals hired someone to replace Wayne Hagin for the radio broadcast. I'm sure Mr. [John] Rooney is very qualified from reading his credentials and comments made by Mike Shannon, but I really enjoyed the broadcast team of Shannon and Hagin. Hagin was always very professional and really communicated what was going on during the game. I guess my question in all of this is why make a change and fix if it's not broken? I really enjoyed Mr. Hagin on the broadcast team. Was I in the minority of the Cardinals listeners? -- Jimmie J., Ripley, Tenn.
This is a touchy question, but I'm going to answer it the best I can.
I was sad to see Hagin let go, because I always had terrific dealings with him personally and because I think he's a very good broadcaster. I wish him well and I hope (and expect) that he will find another good job.
The issue, to the extent there was one, was chemistry. The combination of Hagin and Shannon didn't seem to maximize the two men's talents. So the club, as I understand it, felt that the way to go was to try a new combination.
And according to pretty much all accounts, there simply isn't a better radio man in baseball than Rooney. In my first meeting with Rooney, I found him personally likeable as well. I think he will do an excellent job, and I think the broadcasts will be high-quality. I wish him the best of luck.
What was the thinking behind not offering [Reggie] Sanders arbitration? It seemed highly likely that he would have refused to sign a two-year deal elsewhere, which would have given us a first- or high second-round pick since he was a Type B. And if he had accepted arbitration, it wouldn't have been that bad -- we end up with an outfielder who is better than most of those currently available. -- Richard H., Kirkwood, Mo.
If it was me making the decisions, I probably would have offered Sanders arbitration. But unlike the [Julian] Tavarez decision, I thought it was at least defensible. In Tavarez's case, he's a Type A, he's almost certain to get 3-4 years and even if he went to arbitration he wouldn't be making much more than they're paying [Braden] Looper.
In Sanders' case, he could have gotten an enormous raise in arbitration. Arbitrators tend to look at performance and service time, and the kind of numbers they look at -- batting average, home runs, steals -- all look good for Sanders. The veteran outfielder inked a two-year deal with the Royals on Dec. 23. I think the right move would have been to offer, but I think it was defensible not to.
Will the dimensions of the field at the new Busch be significantly different from the old Busch? If so, do you think they will benefit or hinder any particular Cardinals hitters, pitchers or fielders? -- Sven N., Longmont, Colo.
The dimensions will be a bit different. Here they are, thanks to Joe Abernathy, the Cardinals vice president of stadium operations:
LF foul pole -- 336 feetLF power alley -- 375 feetCF wall -- 400 feetRF power alley -- 375 feetRF foul pole -- 335 feet
The conventional wisdom is that there will be more space in the outfield and that it will play as something of a pitchers' park, but it's hard to know until games have been played. It's even tougher to know which particular hitters and pitchers will benefit.
I am 8 years old (my dad is helping me write this). Who is your favorite baseball player? -- Jesse V., Baltimore
My favorite player of all time is Dwight Evans. I grew up a Red Sox fan and he was the guy I liked most when I was a kid, followed by Marty Barrett. I also liked the Braves a lot, so Dale Murphy is also a personal favorite from my childhood.
As for favorite current players, that's a different question. From the Cardinals, I love watching Pujols and Rolen play. Vlad Guerrero is probably my favorite position player to watch who's not a Cardinal. Edgar Martinez was my favorite guy to watch hit; I was very sad when he retired. My favorite pitchers to watch, well, that's a long list -- Brad Lidge, Roy Oswalt, Mark Prior, Francisco Rodriguez and Pedro Martinez.
Who do you think will start at second base next year? -- Cody B., Mediapolis, Iowa
I expect it will be Junior Spivey, and my guess is that the Spivey signing will turn out to be the single shrewdest move the Cardinals made this winter.
I have seen on the N.J. Cardinals Web site that they have sold the team. I have seen nothing about a move in the news. Where is the Cardinals farm club going to be playing in the spring? -- David R., North Little Rock, Ark.
The New Jersey Cardinals are no more. Their replacement in the short-season Class A New York-Penn League will be the State College (Pa.) Spikes.
Source: http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/